Companies use advertisements to influence people to buy things sometimes which they don’t need. Give your opinion about this practice?
Recently, the phenomenon of influential advertisements and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by that the matter of TV commercial is highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly as both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that selling products can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, buying useful goods can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of global advertising companies, as well as local banners, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the importance of online shopping stores. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both exporting and importing high-quality materials apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, purchasing useless goods might increase the consequences of producing cheap devices. Moreover, the fundamental elements of spending extra money might relate to this reality that the demerits of low-quality products would pertain to old-fashioned companies. As an example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of online advertising is correlated negatively with traditional production methods. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of bankrupt families.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of the advertising industry far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of being affected by buying unnecessary stuff prove the significance of essential goods, but also pinpoint long-term implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 203, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing companies, as well as local banners, are inextricably bound up. According to ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1540.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 265.0 242.827586207 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.81132075472 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30436780105 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 139.433497537 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.679245283019 0.580463131201 117% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 379.143842365 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8378726518 50.4703680194 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.333333333 104.977214359 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0833333333 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0875588215107 0.242375264174 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0261688679644 0.0925447433944 28% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0265110348653 0.071462118173 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0476084054469 0.151781067708 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0188324386983 0.0609392437508 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.42 11.5310837438 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.22 8.32886699507 135% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 55.0591133005 198% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.