Should the government build more roads to allow more vehicle owner or improve the network of public transport?
Recently, the phenomenon of governmental services and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of building roads is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that public transportation development can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, developed public transportation system can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of subway stations, as well as bus lanes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered an improvement in public transportation network capacity. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both an eco-friendly public bus and establishing online taxies apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, expensive transportation might increase the consequences of private cars. Moreover, fundamental aspects of free transport system would relate to this reality that the demerits of affordable taxies pertain to old-fashion buses. As an example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of high-speed trains is correlated negatively with old cars. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of facilitated airports.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of governmental construction far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of transportation infrastructure prove the significance of a good public transport system, but also pinpoint long-term implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1531.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 262.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.84351145038 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.46661763034 2.71678728327 128% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 139.433497537 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.660305343511 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 379.143842365 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6621411416 50.4703680194 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.583333333 104.977214359 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8333333333 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141170509249 0.242375264174 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0443794608691 0.0925447433944 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0404153962807 0.071462118173 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0775363859063 0.151781067708 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0283946490011 0.0609392437508 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.59 11.5310837438 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.95 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 55.0591133005 189% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.