Television has two roles: to inform and to entertain. Explain which of these roles you see as more important. To what extent do you think that TV today performs each of these roles in an effective way?
Recently, the phenomenon of Television roles and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of entertaining people is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that appropriate movies can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, informative TV programs can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of comedy movies, as well as old-fashioned TV casts, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered The importance of TV programs. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both influencing children and modern movie genres apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, Television series might increase the consequences of inappropriate movies. Moreover, fundamental aspects of traditional entertaining methods would relate to this reality that the demerits of well-educated directors pertain to watching family movies. As an example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of violent movies is correlated negatively with becoming a criminal. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of innovative TV series.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of effective TV broadcasts far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of online programs prove the significance of important roles of TV, but also pinpoint long-term implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1480.0 1207.87684729 123% => OK
No of words: 260.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.69230769231 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32563114088 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.673076923077 0.580463131201 116% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 379.143842365 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6897723895 50.4703680194 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.333333333 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146423057182 0.242375264174 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0454980401946 0.0925447433944 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0362617708874 0.071462118173 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.079601924919 0.151781067708 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0255819854309 0.0609392437508 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 12.6369458128 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.72 11.5310837438 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.99 8.32886699507 132% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 55.0591133005 189% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.