Some students work while studying. This often results in lacking time for education and constantly feeling under pressure
Recently, the phenomenon of the work-study balance and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of leisure time is highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly as both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that teaching methods can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, hard-working students can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of online courses, as well as doing homework, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the importance of class attendance for students. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both online jobs and various job opportunities apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, being under pressure might increase the consequences of hopeless pupils. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of punctual students might relate to this reality that the demerits of the college curriculum pertain to proactive undergraduates. As an example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of a noisy workplace is correlated negatively with unconcentrated people. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of educational achievements.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of lacking time for working far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of part-time jobs prove the significance of high-quality studying, but also pinpoint long-term implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1490.0 1207.87684729 123% => OK
No of words: 262.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.68702290076 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32368025187 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 139.433497537 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.675572519084 0.580463131201 116% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 379.143842365 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1278494454 50.4703680194 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.166666667 104.977214359 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8333333333 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219055218658 0.242375264174 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0605120681743 0.0925447433944 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0414966635515 0.071462118173 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110371919729 0.151781067708 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0425521468345 0.0609392437508 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 12.6369458128 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.72 11.5310837438 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.13 8.32886699507 134% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 55.0591133005 194% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.