Should there be a wage cap for highly-paid people? Is it good or bad?
Recently, the phenomenon of a wage cap for highly-paid people and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matters of a sufficient wage are highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to conceive that brilliant employees can be a plus, and I will investigate that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, a wage cap for well-paid persons can provide the society with noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as the advantages of a high income, are visible. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the importance of sophisticated workers. Thus, the beneficial ramifications of an efficient wage cap are remarkable.
From a scientific point of view, a wage cap for people can provide the community with negative impacts, which are associated with the reality that the demerits of an insufficient wage are crucial. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by an elite university described an adverse cap. Hence, predicted outcomes of inexperienced people are critical.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of a wage cap for well-paid persons far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of an equitable wage cap prove the significance of a hard-working employee, but also pinpoint possible implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-27 | Sridarani | 88 | view |
| 2023-08-17 | Bilal620 | 80 | view |
| 2023-08-17 | Bilal Khalid | 80 | view |
| 2023-08-17 | Bilal Khalid | 85 | view |
| 2023-08-17 | Bilal Khalid | 85 | view |
- What roles should governments companies and individuals play to combat climate change 88
- School children nowadays are not playing more sports compared to their parents in their childhood Do you agree or disagree Support your ideas with examples 85
- Extreme sports Dangerous activities like skiing bungee jumping rafting diving should be banned Agree or disagree 85
- Some people work for long hours and hard to achieve success and some give importance to free time for them Give your opinion and discuss your views 77
- Schools should prepare students for university rather than for work To what extent do you agree with this statement 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1296.0 1207.87684729 107% => OK
No of words: 240.0 242.827586207 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28268817689 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 139.433497537 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604166666667 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 421.2 379.143842365 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.9224787097 50.4703680194 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.818181818 104.977214359 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8181818182 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334439670221 0.242375264174 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121880218961 0.0925447433944 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0918547747762 0.071462118173 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203570043665 0.151781067708 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.03860672116 0.0609392437508 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 12.6369458128 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 11.5310837438 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.4 8.32886699507 125% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 55.0591133005 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.