Some effective people like repetitive routine such as eating the same food, do you like this way? Discuss your views.
Nowadays, the attitudes of some effective people to have a repetitive routine life have become a long-running dispute among the public all over the world, which leads to a moot question “whether following repetitive routine lifestyle is a reasonable decision or not?”. It is a widely held view that providing challenging and diverse life is highly beneficial, whereas I tend to believe that one must weigh up carefully the pros and cons of this issue.
To begine with, it is a common belief that changing your lifestyle plays a vital role in the cut-throat society. To put into consideration, I express why I support this idea. First and foremost is that those who reluctant to alter their life have a limited ability and framework and refuse to experience new circumstances. Secondly, it can be argued that following stable routine cause lack of self-confidence as well as you might accustom your habits that leads to deterioration and lack of progress. In addition to this information, it should be mentioned that alter the situation broaden your mind to a new idea.
However, there is no doubt that repetitive routine provides people with various negative points. It should be taken into account that the supporters of sedentary lifestyle think that they are more likely prosperous people and could have a stable life in terms of job opportunity and relationship. Moreover, opponents of repetitive routine suppose that changing your position is a big obstacle to reach sustainable situation.
To recapitulate, I firmly believe that having a repetitive routine in order to have efficient life must be taken into consideration. However, as every garden may have some weeds, the local authorities are recommended to enforce stricter legislation, and the individuals are hoped to heighten their intellect.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 96, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...e a repetitive routine life have become a long-running dispute among the public all over the w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, whereas, in addition, no doubt, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 5.94088669951 236% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 33.0 20.9802955665 157% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1535.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 291.0 242.827586207 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27491408935 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08138794085 2.71678728327 113% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 139.433497537 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570446735395 0.580463131201 98% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 379.143842365 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.566473223 50.4703680194 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.916666667 104.977214359 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.25 20.9669160288 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.75 7.25397266985 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194015610123 0.242375264174 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0641262751487 0.0925447433944 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0401774765252 0.071462118173 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112316676395 0.151781067708 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0416892430511 0.0609392437508 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 53.1260098522 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.5310837438 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.32886699507 111% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 55.0591133005 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.