Some people prefer following the same routine everyday like eating the same food for breakfast, reading books at a particular time and likewise. From tv stars to super models, a solid daily routine is a key to success. Personally, I don’t like being repetitive in my daily life and avoid following a course of action.
Repetitive behaviors or routines are important to many effective people as it allows a better control of the everyday life or a process but consequently it restricts the mind’s ability to improve beyond certain limits. Acting or behaving in a limited framework makes the person lazy as it causes us to lose our interest in adopting new habits. When anyone locks oneself in a habit or routine, he/she refuses to change.
Many experts believe that changing a routine or moving between two activities, can be distressing for some people and it greatly increased their refusal of the challenge. What I believe is, avoiding routine can have numerous benefits on the well-being of the mind and overall personality of the individual. When we shake up the routine, we opt to do one thing differently. For the good reasons, sometimes a different perspective is all we need to change the particular process or situation. By restricting my freedom of action, I definitely do not want to restrict my mind from enriching the knowledge base.
For example, every day I listen to music from different genres to diversify my experience of music and to stimulate my mind. To conclude, though routine offers a sense of security by constructing a comfort zone, but I like to challenge personal stabilization and ask for unusual experience in my daily life.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, if, likewise, so, well, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 8.36945812808 167% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 20.9802955665 119% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1396.0 1207.87684729 116% => OK
No of words: 279.0 242.827586207 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00358422939 5.00649968141 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9283965717 2.71678728327 108% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 139.433497537 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609318996416 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 379.143842365 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7008388204 50.4703680194 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.384615385 104.977214359 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4615384615 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.15384615385 7.25397266985 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190922885256 0.242375264174 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0612643472888 0.0925447433944 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0769898095051 0.071462118173 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114714482622 0.151781067708 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0849002706802 0.0609392437508 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 12.6369458128 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.1260098522 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 11.5310837438 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 55.0591133005 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.