These days, there is an ongoing debate about the phenomenon of some experience in private life and its corresponding impact, while it is possible to claim that the matter of personal life is highly beneficial, my view is that personal experience in lifespan can be a plus, in this essay, I would explain my point of view by analyzing both sides of the argument.
On the one hand, there are several solid reasons why personal life are considered to be advantageous. One of them is that from a social standpoint personal life and corresponding activity can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of live performances, as well as personal problems, are inextricably bound up beside. Moreover, it also can be argued that beneficial ramifications of both lifelong ambition and learned experience apparently can be seen.
On the other hand, those who argue against private life might increase the consequences of happiness in lifespan hold a different view. Firstly, it is claimed that formal education and books are still essential for people to learn technical skills. Then, there are concerns about Works in the field of computer science, for example, often require high eligibility of criterion based on the knowledge of programming.
In conclusion, while there are strong arguments on both sides of the case, I firmly believe that the benefits of taking enough time for private and personal life far outweigh its drawbacks.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 469, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to experience'
Suggestion: to experience
...s of both lifelong ambition and learned experience apparently can be seen. On the other...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, still, then, well, while, for example, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.5418719212 161% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1243.0 1207.87684729 103% => OK
No of words: 242.0 242.827586207 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13636363636 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85135045898 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590909090909 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 398.7 379.143842365 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 12.6551724138 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.5024630542 146% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 83.0684017843 50.4703680194 165% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.375 104.977214359 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.25 20.9669160288 144% => OK
Discourse Markers: 16.875 7.25397266985 233% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207148221326 0.242375264174 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0793300294925 0.0925447433944 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0444367087974 0.071462118173 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110560212945 0.151781067708 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0527686939918 0.0609392437508 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 12.6369458128 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 11.5310837438 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.32886699507 110% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 55.0591133005 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 9.94827586207 201% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.3980295567 135% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.