Some people argue that it is a good for children to study in a boarding school, while others suggest children live with the family.
What is your opinion?
One of the most conspicuous trends of today’s world is a colossal upsurge in the number of people arguing that it is a good for children to study in a boarding school, while other suggest children live with family. There are both merits and demerits to this trend, although I am of the opinion that former outdo the latter.
There are myriad of arguments in favour of my stance. The most preponderant one is that going to boarding school makes children self-dependent. Not only do children perform their daily tasks themselves, but they also have to face a new environment and different people. Apparently, it gives them an opportunity to learn a great many attributes such as discipline, punctuality and social skills. Needless to say, all these merits will stand student in good stead, when it comes to preparing them well for future.
There are, however, some drawbacks which can easily overwhelm the potential benefits of boarding school. The primary one stems from the fact that they have tough rules and regulations which are cumbersome for adolescents to follow. Besides, living far away from home for a long time period can create a gap between parents and children. It is apparent that why many are against of boarding school.
In view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that the despite having some drawbacks, the benefits of boarding school are indeed too great to ignore.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, besides, but, however, if, so, well, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.75862068966 17% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1177.0 1207.87684729 97% => OK
No of words: 236.0 242.827586207 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98728813559 5.00649968141 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66334711213 2.71678728327 98% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 139.433497537 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627118644068 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 358.2 379.143842365 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.896946985 50.4703680194 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0833333333 104.977214359 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 20.9669160288 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 7.25397266985 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.378894393738 0.242375264174 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110120382501 0.0925447433944 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.144318699131 0.071462118173 202% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212113150596 0.151781067708 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.151588941053 0.0609392437508 249% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 12.6369458128 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.1260098522 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.9458128079 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 11.5310837438 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.32886699507 103% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 55.0591133005 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.