should government build more roads to allow more vehicle owner or improve the network of public transport?
The idea of improving the network public transport is widely debated, with many people claiming that the benefits it offers are no match for its drawbacks. However, I do not agree with this and I will explain in this essay.
There are a number of arguments in favour of my stance. The most preponderant one is that by improving public transport public can save their valuable time. Not only can they save their money by using public transport and avoiding buying private cars, but they can also communicates with other passengers on different topics. Needless to say, all these benefits stand public in good stead with it comes to doing saving and maximum utilising of resources.
Another pivotal aspect of this trend is that Government can win the confidence of their public as they are paying equal importance to everyone. Beside, this technique is also adopted by developed countries so it is a lesson for underdeveloping countries to adopt this technique. In addition, when they are less private vehicle than the chances f pollution are very low.
In the view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that the benefits of public transport are indeed too great to ignore.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 270, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'communicate'
Suggestion: communicate
... buying private cars, but they can also communicates with other passengers on different topi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 989.0 1207.87684729 82% => OK
No of words: 200.0 242.827586207 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.945 5.00649968141 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.92707691288 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62982413861 2.71678728327 97% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 139.433497537 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.605 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 311.4 379.143842365 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.6214822825 50.4703680194 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.9 104.977214359 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.9669160288 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.9 7.25397266985 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145784504298 0.242375264174 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0579569833088 0.0925447433944 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0545690024727 0.071462118173 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.086556340449 0.151781067708 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0216300302566 0.0609392437508 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 12.6369458128 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.1260098522 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 11.5310837438 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.32886699507 102% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 55.0591133005 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.94827586207 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 55.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.