Should government build more roads to allow more vehicle owner or improve the network of public transport?

Essay topics:

Should government build more roads to allow more vehicle owner or improve the network of public transport?

The importance of the government build more roads to allow more vehicle owner or improve the network public transport which was always debatable has now controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while others reject this notion. The substantial influence of this trend has sparked over the potential impact in recent years. In my opinion, the former proposition appears to be more rational. This essay will further elaborate positive and negative impacts and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.

There are myriad of reasons which will further explain this arguments but the one stems from the fact that government build the more roads for easy to travel and it is beneficial for us. Another pivotal aspect of this argument is the public are satisfied to build new roads. Needless to say, all these merits stand in a good stead.

However, there are some pitfalls that negate these arguments and which can certainly overwhelm the potential influence of this trend but one of the most alarming is that new build roads are main cause of accidents. Besides, many people are facing more problems like highway accident and over speeding. Hence it is apparent why many are against this trend.

According to the arguments aforementioned above one can reach to a conclusion that the benefits of build more roads to allow more vehicle owner to improve the network public transport are instrumental indeed. Nevertheless, its potential drawbacks should not be overlooked either

Votes
Average: 7.7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 215, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ny people claiming that it is beneficial while others reject this notion. The sub...
^^
Line 3, column 56, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...d of reasons which will further explain this arguments but the one stems from the fa...
^^^^
Line 7, column 303, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...ike highway accident and over speeding. Hence it is apparent why many are against thi...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, hence, however, look, nevertheless, so, thus, while, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1257.0 1207.87684729 104% => OK
No of words: 243.0 242.827586207 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17283950617 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61996136057 2.71678728327 96% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 139.433497537 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.580463131201 96% => OK
syllable_count: 388.8 379.143842365 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.3397274192 50.4703680194 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.75 104.977214359 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.25 20.9669160288 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 7.25397266985 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.423850428679 0.242375264174 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132296182198 0.0925447433944 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.180712680733 0.071462118173 253% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.273415587404 0.151781067708 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.160942186098 0.0609392437508 264% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 12.6369458128 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.1260098522 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.5310837438 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.32886699507 102% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 55.0591133005 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.