Some people believe that academic subjects such as chemistry, physics, and history should be taught in schools, while others believe that students will derive more benefit from studying practical subjects, such as motor mechanics and cooking. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Recent days, there has been colossal upsurge in the trends to see the prodigies discussing the benefits of having various subjects in schools’ curriculum. Few people believe that academic subjects such as chemistry, physics, and history would bring more advantages, while others completely despise it and maintain a view that practical subjects are more important instead. This essay will elaborate on both sides of the argument to prudently persuade how academic subjects hold more advantages.
On the one hand, there are myriad of merits of having academic subjects in schools. Firstly, these subjects are building blocks for the glittering future of the pupils. In other words, it would be almost impossible for children to comprehend disciplines in their tertiary education without having adequate understanding of these topics. For example, if a student pursues electrical in his university, he would not be able to understand and make the electric circuits without sufficient knowledge of physics. Secondly, some subjects such as history, are essential so that children can appreciate the past of their country. Thus, history, physics and chemistry are indispensable.
On the other hand, practical subjects such as cooking, and mechanics are also critical. To begin with, if any student, somehow, could not join the universities, he can get a job based on his practical experience. For example, he can join a hotel as a chef. Additionally, when a student with hands-on experience in one subject, joins the same discipline in university, he becomes an expert in the subject, which undoubtedly, stands him out of others. Hence, practical exposure is also favourable.
In conclusion, after looking at both sides, I radically believe that theoretical subjects are of utmost importance in the schools. Consequently, I believe that schools should impart knowledge on theoretical subjects to its pupils.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, hence, if, look, second, secondly, so, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, in other words, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1622.0 1207.87684729 134% => OK
No of words: 295.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49830508475 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00915007933 2.71678728327 111% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 139.433497537 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589830508475 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 503.1 379.143842365 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 4.6157635468 195% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 12.6551724138 126% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.5611866331 50.4703680194 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.375 104.977214359 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4375 20.9669160288 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8125 7.25397266985 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.339614897468 0.242375264174 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0971408103689 0.0925447433944 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.092486833389 0.071462118173 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18912422724 0.151781067708 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0827760172986 0.0609392437508 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 12.6369458128 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.1260098522 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 11.5310837438 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 55.0591133005 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.