Some people believe that the digital age has made us lazier, others claim that it has made us more knowledgeable.
The impact of the digital age, which was always debatable, has now become more controversial. While some people believe that the digital age has made us lazier, others claim that it has made us more knowledgeable. This essay will elaborate on both sides of the debate and thus lead to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why people can gain more knowledge in the digital world but the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that most of the knowledge can be found on the Internet. In fact, the Internet has gradually become the storage of data and electronic resources and the information is simply accessible anywhere with computers. According to a recent study conducted by reputable researchers at Harvard University, the amount of data stored on the Internet has significantly increased to millions of petabytes in recent years. Thus, it is inevitable that digital advancement has positively changed the way how people achieve knowledge.
Nevertheless, some people adopt an opposing view and tend to believe that laziness and sedentary lifestyle have been attributed to these digital technologies. Actually, a major number of people have become more dependent on computers and mobile devices when searching for information. For example, students nowadays tend to spend entirely their time on computers to conduct their academic research, instead of working in libraries and classes. As a result, they would damage their communication skills and their creativities which are crucial in human society.
In conclusion, while there are strong arguments on both sides of the debate, I strongly believe that although digital age contributes to the most significant in knowledge sharing, being too much dependent on it could lead to negative effects on the people's behavior.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 250, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...t could lead to negative effects on the peoples behavior.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, if, nevertheless, so, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, in fact, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1522.0 1207.87684729 126% => OK
No of words: 286.0 242.827586207 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32167832168 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91087223568 2.71678728327 107% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597902097902 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 379.143842365 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.7644451391 50.4703680194 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.833333333 104.977214359 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8333333333 20.9669160288 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.16666666667 7.25397266985 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.345266619 0.242375264174 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12559843821 0.0925447433944 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.252839193958 0.071462118173 354% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213974560776 0.151781067708 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.227146498913 0.0609392437508 373% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 53.1260098522 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 11.5310837438 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.8 8.32886699507 118% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 55.0591133005 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.