Some people believe law changes human behavior. Do you agree/disagree?
Nowadays, laws have a vital role in every society, and they are laid by the government to prevent society’s breaking apart. Although the law is regarded positive and constructive by some, many hold an opponent’s view and claim that law can change human behavior. I am highly inclined to believe that imposing legislation could be beneficial in order to prevent chaos in society. This essay will review both sides by providing some academic evidence before concluding.
On the one hand, there are several reasons why I support the idea that imposing law could be beneficial. Firstly, an array of inhabitants argued that law play a crucial role in social development. Secondly, they use an essential valid logic to support that it could help to increase the functionality of a nation by making their environment safer place. For instance, according to an academic research conducted by Tehran University, more restricted traffic legislation could lead to decrease the amount of accident in roads and correspond to that, less road death. However, forcing some limitation on human behavior just could lead to chaos when the human nature is immutable.
On the other hand, the restricted forcing law could have various adverse aspects to people lives. For examples, statistics in the US in 2016 shows imposing laws could create a sense of fear among inhabitants of getting punished, and it could lead to some sort of social disorder such as terrorism or vandalism. Hence, authorities should try more soft way to make laws more acceptable to all people.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both side, my sentiment is that the benefits of law far outweigh its drawbacks, and it could help to control the increasing rhythm of development in society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 194, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun hold seems to be countable; consider using: 'many holds'.
Suggestion: many holds
...rded positive and constructive by some, many hold an opponent's view and claim that ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e academic evidence before concluding. On the one hand, there are several reaso...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, however, second, secondly, so, while, for example, for instance, sort of, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 6.10837438424 196% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 31.9359605911 132% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1498.0 1207.87684729 124% => OK
No of words: 290.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16551724138 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85513076765 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606896551724 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 379.143842365 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.2108452088 50.4703680194 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.230769231 104.977214359 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3076923077 20.9669160288 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.46153846154 7.25397266985 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193726233118 0.242375264174 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0692801784102 0.0925447433944 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0703121352024 0.071462118173 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110618005007 0.151781067708 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0597984618873 0.0609392437508 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 12.6369458128 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.1260098522 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.5310837438 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.32886699507 112% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 55.0591133005 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.