Some people believe laws change human behavior. Do you agree with it?

Over the past few decades, there has been a high degree of the ambivalence over this matter, whether the law changes human behavior. Whereas some people say that law does not impact human behavior, I sanguinely believe that it does. This essay will further discuss reasons to support this notion and then deduce a logical conclusion.

At the outset, there are myriads of reasons to support this notion, but one of the most compelling reason is that law affects the human phycology. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which revealed that local laws impacted the student's behavior. Thus, The beneficial ramification of the change in law apparently can be seen.

On the contrary, skeptics conjecture that law does not change the human behavior, its the environment. Although it seems ostensibly veridical, this is the one-sided story. As a tangible example, researchers from a renowned organization conducted research on this topic which showed that laws enforced in a city significantly changes the human behavior. Hence, this is correct to presume the preconceived notion of the skeptics.

To conclude, where there are several compelling arguments from both the sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of the change in law far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the change in law prove its significance, but also pinpoints complication of no changing them.

Votes
Average: 8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 292, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...h revealed that local laws impacted the students behavior. Thus, The beneficial ramifica...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 83, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...law does not change the human behavior, its the environment. Although it seems oste...
^^^
Line 5, column 360, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...antly changes the human behavior. Hence, this is correct to presume the preconcei...
^^
Line 7, column 275, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oints complication of no changing them.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, so, then, thus, whereas, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 8.36945812808 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 20.9802955665 119% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 31.9359605911 75% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1207.0 1207.87684729 100% => OK
No of words: 230.0 242.827586207 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24782608696 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91039789015 2.71678728327 107% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 139.433497537 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604347826087 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 376.2 379.143842365 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.6261139383 50.4703680194 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.583333333 104.977214359 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1666666667 20.9669160288 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 7.25397266985 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.340301712252 0.242375264174 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124660014843 0.0925447433944 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102093121484 0.071462118173 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202330799584 0.151781067708 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0437875781512 0.0609392437508 72% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 12.6369458128 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.1260098522 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 11.5310837438 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.32886699507 116% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 55.0591133005 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.