Some people claim that public transport should be free of charge, while other disagree. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Recently, the phenomenon of the free transport system for people and its corresponding impact has a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of the reasonable bus ticket is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that considering affordable public transport system for citizen can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, the cheap transport network in cities can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of the reasonable price subway’s ticket, as well as affordable vehicle, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experience which discovered the influence of the free bus on peoples’ life expenditures. Thus, the beneficial ramifications of both reasonable price commuting and saving money can be seen.
Within the realm of the traffic science, the free of charge transport system might increase the consequences of encouraging people to ignore using the private car. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of enjoying clean atmosphere could relate to this reality that the demerits of air pollution pertain to the widespread use of public transport. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of using the private cars is correlated negatively with the expensive trains.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of being the public transport system free of charge for people far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of providing a cheap and affordable vehicle prove the significance of increasing use of public transport, but also pinpoint social implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1640.0 1207.87684729 136% => OK
No of words: 297.0 242.827586207 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52188552189 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14950725987 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 139.433497537 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59595959596 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 379.143842365 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 41.9671260563 50.4703680194 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.090909091 104.977214359 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 20.9669160288 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.27272727273 7.25397266985 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212147634181 0.242375264174 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0791748531606 0.0925447433944 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0503619828291 0.071462118173 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129742416906 0.151781067708 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0412982309158 0.0609392437508 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 12.6369458128 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 53.1260098522 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 11.5310837438 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.35 8.32886699507 124% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 55.0591133005 183% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.