Some people claim that public transport should be free of charge, while other disagrees. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Recently, the phenomenon of claiming public transport being free of charge and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that being charge free can be a plus, I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, some people claiming public transport being free can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic research and I discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both common phenomenon and accordingly complicated procedures are apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, being free of charge or claiming by some people might increase the consequence of critical issues, as a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university asserted that the downside of creative processes is negatively correlated with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of public transport or charge-free far outweigh the drawbacks, not only due to the advantages of this unique phenomenon but also pinpoint thorny issues’ potential implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.75862068966 35% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1382.0 1207.87684729 114% => OK
No of words: 245.0 242.827586207 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.64081632653 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19590533529 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 139.433497537 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632653061224 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 440.1 379.143842365 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6551724138 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.8337835709 50.4703680194 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.555555556 104.977214359 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2222222222 20.9669160288 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4444444444 7.25397266985 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255446905928 0.242375264174 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0943977216809 0.0925447433944 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0776063032461 0.071462118173 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148659022181 0.151781067708 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0200386614909 0.0609392437508 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 12.6369458128 148% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 53.1260098522 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.9458128079 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.73 11.5310837438 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.84 8.32886699507 130% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 55.0591133005 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.4444444444 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.