some people point that experiential learning can work well in formal education.
The importance of some people point that experiential learning can work well in formal education Which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while others reject this notion. The substantial influence of this trend has sparked the controversy over the potential impact in recent years. In my opinion, the former proposition appears to be more rational. This essay will further elaborate my views for favoring the positive impact and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
There are myriad of reasons which will further elaborate this argument but the most preponderant one stems from the fact is that education is very important for all the world’s and need for best teaching. Consequently, some people point that experiential learning can work well in formal education. Another pivotal aspect of this trend however others think a traditional form of teaching is the best. Needless to say, all these merits stand in a good stead.
Elaborating my viewpoint, there are some more merits but one the crucial effects is that mostly students achieve the successful in high schools and colleges. Besides, schools and universities provide the learning can work well in formal education. Hence, it is apparent why many are favor of this trend.
According to the arguments aforementioned above, one can reach to a conclusion that the beneficial learning can work well in formal education are indeed too great to ignore.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cation are indeed too great to ignore.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, consequently, hence, however, so, thus, well, while, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 31.9359605911 75% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1254.0 1207.87684729 104% => OK
No of words: 238.0 242.827586207 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26890756303 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78480155396 2.71678728327 103% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 139.433497537 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558823529412 0.580463131201 96% => OK
syllable_count: 383.4 379.143842365 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.8938460839 50.4703680194 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.5 104.977214359 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8333333333 20.9669160288 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 7.25397266985 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.438917976574 0.242375264174 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.16605808022 0.0925447433944 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.243532986745 0.071462118173 341% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.277638347878 0.151781067708 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0463809178446 0.0609392437508 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 12.6369458128 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.1260098522 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 11.5310837438 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.32886699507 104% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 55.0591133005 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.