Some people point that experiential learning (i.e. learning by doing it) can work well in formal education. However, others
think a traditional form of teaching is the best. Do you think experiential learning is beneficial in high schools or colleges?
Recently the phenomenon of experimental learning has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question " Is experimental learning beneficial in high schools and colleges?". Whereas, it is a widely held view that traditional teaching is highly beneficial. I will discuss the controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the educational standpoint, formal education is bound up inextricably with experimental learning, which indicates they lead to both teachers and students. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between courses and tutors as well as an exponential increase in cognitive skills. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of universities is correlated positively with not only colleges but also traditional teaching methods.
Within the realm of society, without the slightest doubt, experimental learning attribute teaching methods, in that it would come down to the society, social skills, and learning abilities. A salient example of such attribution is weak performances, which is a cause of concern since it was mistaken to take education roles for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars have had the opportunity to pinpoint practical courses problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to communications, professions, and even exams. Hence, it is correct to infer the pivotal role of experimental learning in social development.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that experimental learning can work well in formal education. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-12-20 | brandnewiman | 88 | view |
- Large shopping malls are replacing small local shops in cities and towns. In your own experience is it a positive development? 85
- Internet or media is bad for young people they make the young generation poor in communication and forming relationships Do you agree with this opinion please use examples or your personal experience to support your idea 56
- The three pie charts below show the cahnges in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 1991 and 2001 Summerise the information by selecting and reportingthe main features and make caomparsions where relevant 40
- Some universities/schools believe that students/children should learn typing rather than a good handwriting. How far do you agree with that? Show reasons with your experience. 88
- There are more men or women in certain jobs and there s nothing we can change about it Do you agree with that 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 208, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...al in high schools and colleges?'. Whereas, it is a widely held view that traditio...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1637.0 1207.87684729 136% => OK
No of words: 280.0 242.827586207 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.84642857143 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32115782307 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 139.433497537 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.657142857143 0.580463131201 113% => OK
syllable_count: 502.2 379.143842365 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.0074670256 50.4703680194 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.928571429 104.977214359 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.9669160288 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.25397266985 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218818656303 0.242375264174 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0597304155344 0.0925447433944 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0666003734284 0.071462118173 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128210609044 0.151781067708 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0515367105211 0.0609392437508 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.65 11.5310837438 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.55 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 55.0591133005 191% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.