some people think the advertisement is bad
The importance of some people think the advertisement is bad which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while others reject this notion. The substantial influence of this trend has sparked the controversy over the potential impact in recent years. In my opinion, the former proposition appears to be more rational. This essay will further elaborate both positive and negative effect of this trend and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
There are myriad of reasons which will further elaborate this argument but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that some people think the advertising is bad because it encouraged people to by things they do not need or cannot afford. Another pivotal aspect of this argument is that while others believe that advertisement is good because it can improve people’s lives. Needless to say, all these merits stand in a good stead.
However, there are some pitfalls that negate these arguments and which can certainly overwhelm the potential influence of this trend but one of the most alarming one is that nowadays mostly ladies odder online makeup. Hence, it is apparent why many are against this trend.
According to the arguments aforementioned above, one can reach to a conclusion that the benefits of some people advertisement is bad are instrument indeed.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, so, thus, while, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 31.9359605911 72% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1158.0 1207.87684729 96% => OK
No of words: 224.0 242.827586207 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16964285714 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74185656508 2.71678728327 101% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 139.433497537 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.580463131201 98% => OK
syllable_count: 367.2 379.143842365 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.4564969573 50.4703680194 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.8 104.977214359 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.1 7.25397266985 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.337963369669 0.242375264174 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128374205844 0.0925447433944 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.16272705901 0.071462118173 228% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227415251035 0.151781067708 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117929866451 0.0609392437508 194% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 12.6369458128 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.1260098522 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.5310837438 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.32886699507 108% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 55.0591133005 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.