Some people think digital ... make them lazier while some people think it gives them more knowledge what's your idea?
Recently, the phenomenon of being knowledgeable by digital and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of digital technology is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe the digital knowledge can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, giving knowledge by digital can provide the society with some noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that merits of digital methods, as well as keeping up with the latest knowledge are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the influence of digital devices on people awareness. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both the digital tools and the digital education apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, making people lazier might increase the consequences of sedentary society. Moreover, fundamental aspects of the digital program could relate to this reality that the demerits of digital devices pertain to lack of activity. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of making the society digital is correlated with machinery task. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of the digital knowledge.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of the digital knowledge far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of the digital camera prove the significance of the digital science, but also pinpoint practical implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1503.0 1207.87684729 124% => OK
No of words: 271.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54612546125 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10323108452 2.71678728327 114% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 139.433497537 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60147601476 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 379.143842365 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.467841064 50.4703680194 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.25 104.977214359 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5833333333 20.9669160288 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206079703468 0.242375264174 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.072075894573 0.0925447433944 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0331740197999 0.071462118173 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120951500213 0.151781067708 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0389344627341 0.0609392437508 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.21 11.5310837438 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.2 8.32886699507 122% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 55.0591133005 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.