Some people think school leavers should go to find a job rather than university education. Others think the university education is essential for professional development. What’s your opinion of these two views?
Recently, the phenomenon of some people think school leavers should go to find a job rather than university education and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complicated procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the others think the university education is essential for professional development can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, finding a job and university education are both essential for professional development of school leavers can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in this fact that the crucial issues, and ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of this common phenomenon and accordingly complex procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, professional development and university education are essential for school leavers might increase the consequences of critical issues. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notions of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of university education are essential for school leavers to find a job and professional development far outweigh of its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint the thorny issues' potential implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1652.0 1207.87684729 137% => OK
No of words: 286.0 242.827586207 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.77622377622 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28158355827 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587412587413 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 379.143842365 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.464284827 50.4703680194 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.181818182 104.977214359 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 20.9669160288 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.90909090909 7.25397266985 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.354835554835 0.242375264174 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127011448161 0.0925447433944 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129775448563 0.071462118173 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217012306971 0.151781067708 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0885162393349 0.0609392437508 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 12.6369458128 149% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 19.71 53.1260098522 37% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 6.54236453202 223% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.0 10.9458128079 155% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.54 11.5310837438 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.34 8.32886699507 124% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 55.0591133005 178% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 9.94827586207 171% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.