Over the past few decades, there has been a high degree of the ambivalence over this matter, whether the school should select students according to their academic abilities. Whereas some people say that it is better to have students with the different abilities studying together, I sanguinely side with the first view. This essay will further discuss reasons to support this notion and the deduce a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are myriads of reasons to support this notion, but one of the most compelling reason is that selecting students as per their academic abilities will give them more time with the teachers. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I conducted an academic research which revealed that students who had the same abilities when they studied together performed better in their exam. Thus, the beneficial ramification of selecting students according to their abilities apparently can be seen.
On the contrary, skeptics conjecture that separating students will damage students as they will not have exposure to students with different abilities. Although it seems ostensibly veridical, this is the one-sided story. As a tangible example, research conducted by a reputed organization revealed that when students are separated as per their academic level, teachers can focus on class accordingly. Hence, This is correct to presume a preconceived notion of the skeptics.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments from both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of selecting students as per their abilities far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the benefits of separating students as per their abilities prove its significance, but also pinpoints the implication of not doing so.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 388, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...cuss reasons to support this notion and the deduce a logical conclusion. At the outset,...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, first, hence, if, so, thus, whereas, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 8.36945812808 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 20.9802955665 148% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1495.0 1207.87684729 124% => OK
No of words: 276.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41666666667 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86062828447 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 139.433497537 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557971014493 0.580463131201 96% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 379.143842365 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.3065505213 50.4703680194 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.583333333 104.977214359 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.91666666667 7.25397266985 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.432778008644 0.242375264174 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148799827938 0.0925447433944 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108605857561 0.071462118173 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.256804563593 0.151781067708 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0790377019548 0.0609392437508 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 53.1260098522 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 11.5310837438 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.32886699507 107% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 55.0591133005 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.