Some SCHOOLS believe that CHILDREN should learn typing rather than a good handwriting. How far do you agree with that? Show reasons with your experience.
Recently, the phenomenon of some schools believe that children should learn typing rather than a good handwriting and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complicated procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that learning a good handwriting and typing can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, children should learn typing rather than a good handwriting can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted to this fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
From a public arena, schools should teach a good handwriting and typing to children might increase the consequences of critical needs. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that benefits of a good children should learn a good handwriting rather than typing from schools far outweigh of its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint the thorny issues' potential implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-12-08 | baran.bahrani | 88 | view |
| 2018-11-24 | brandnewiman | 88 | view |
- Company's top-level authorities should get their employees in the decision-making process. 88
- Effective learning requires time, comfort and peace so it is impossible to combine study and employment. Study and employment distract one from another. To what extent do you think the statements are realistic? Support your opinion with examples? 85
- The world s governments and international organizations confront a multitude of the global problem What do you think is the most pressing issue facing the inhabitants of our planets and what solution would you offer 94
- Nowadays, it is increasingly more difficult to maintain the right balance between work and other aspects of one’s life, such as leisure time with family members. How important do you think is this balance? Why do people find it hard to achieve? 88
- Should wealthy nations help poor countries with food and education, or is it the responsibility of poor nations to improve their conditions? 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 77, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to type'.
Suggestion: to type
...ools believe that children should learn typing rather than a good handwriting and its ...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 50, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to type'.
Suggestion: to type
...neral standpoint, children should learn typing rather than a good handwriting can prov...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 119, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'child'?
Suggestion: child
...foundly believe that benefits of a good children should learn a good handwriting rather ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1528.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 269.0 242.827586207 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.68029739777 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20730602792 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598513011152 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 379.143842365 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.3291621178 50.4703680194 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.909090909 104.977214359 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4545454545 20.9669160288 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 7.25397266985 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323630204908 0.242375264174 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11134807986 0.0925447433944 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11019962131 0.071462118173 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195192655619 0.151781067708 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0342591567783 0.0609392437508 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 12.6369458128 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.96 11.5310837438 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.23 8.32886699507 123% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 55.0591133005 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.