Some types of employment are more suitable for men and other types of employment are more appropriate (or women,'
To what extent do you agree with this statement? Support your point of view with reasons and examples from your own experience.
Nowadays with the development of the society it is compulsory for every one to do any types of job. Sometimes people try to divide jobs according to the gender by saying some career opportunities are more suitable for men while other types are more relevant for women. I also agree with this statement in to some extent and here I’m going to discuss about my opinions.
To begin with, few decades ago only men are allowed to do jobs by societies. At that time females were housewives whose responsibility is to look after children. Now society has changed a lot. Hence, most types employment are suitable both males and females. For example, without any gender difference there are doctors, engineers, teachers, drivers even laborers.
In contrast, still there are some job categories which cannot be done by women. For example, in almost all the countries mining is not allowed for ladies by law. Furthermore, even women are capable of doing they prefer to reject some employments, which include night shifts and hard work. All children need their mothers at night. On the other hand, society believe and respect that hard work for men not for women. Hence, by practice physically soft duties are allocated for women employers. Every employee must give maternity leaves for ladies. So that some employees are not interested in giving high responsible jobs for women as when they take maternity leaves management is in a trouble
To conclude, I also agree that some employments are not appropriate for women, not considering the type of the job but considering the qualities of women which are given by mother nature.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, look, so, still, while, for example, in contrast, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.5418719212 161% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 20.9802955665 62% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1362.0 1207.87684729 113% => OK
No of words: 272.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00735294118 5.00649968141 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62725434588 2.71678728327 97% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602941176471 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 379.143842365 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.65517241379 219% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 12.6551724138 126% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 68.6093732208 50.4703680194 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.125 104.977214359 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 20.9669160288 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.3125 7.25397266985 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 2.91625615764 377% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306258088993 0.242375264174 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0891136701862 0.0925447433944 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0756897686876 0.071462118173 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201378352489 0.151781067708 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0924125621215 0.0609392437508 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 12.6369458128 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.1260098522 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.9458128079 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 11.5310837438 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.32886699507 100% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 55.0591133005 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 56.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.