Some types of employment are more suitable for men and other types of employment are more appropriate for women.'
To what extent do you agree with this statement? Support your point of view with reasons and examples from your own experience.
Recently, the notion that various types of employment are more appropriate for men and other forms of work are more suitable for women has become a staple of a long-running discussion among not only scholars but also non-specialists across the world. In fact, this proposition is a provocative one, which I opt to support vigorously. The following passages in this essay bolster my state of agreement with compelling fundamental reasons and pertinent instances.
The first aspect to point out is that women and men are different naturally, in that they have specific features that could not really be found to mention. A striking example is a longitudinal research study, conducted by a panel of human resource management in the Harvard University, in which the relation between the sex and the applicability for various careers meticulously was examined. Therefore, the quantitative results revealed that there is a significant positive correlation between the men and doing high-risk jobs like being a police officer.
Furthermore, women are not as good as men for several employments which need vigor physical condition. Moreover, women are responsible for producing a new generation, and this fact requires a proper level of hygiene that is interestingly not met in several work environments. An empirical study, carried out by a well-reputed university, might be a splendid exemplar of proving this belief. Hence, such statistical analysis of the data derived from a questionnaire has shed light on the pivotal role of the personal interest of women in working in calm situations.
To conclude, it should be hard to ignore the role of the sex to allocate a job to different people. Obviously, not every aspect of this topic is investigated thoroughly in this essay, what I leave for further studies is the impact of regulatory legislation on this matter.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 159, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...itable for women has become a staple of a long-running discussion among not only scholars but ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, really, so, therefore, well, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.5418719212 161% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 31.9359605911 132% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1566.0 1207.87684729 130% => OK
No of words: 299.0 242.827586207 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23745819398 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14197270569 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 139.433497537 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608695652174 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 379.143842365 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 6.0 1.56157635468 384% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.2263625997 50.4703680194 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.5 104.977214359 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9166666667 20.9669160288 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 7.25397266985 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268278008023 0.242375264174 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0787622129977 0.0925447433944 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0717056295708 0.071462118173 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145467084875 0.151781067708 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0876697412103 0.0609392437508 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 12.6369458128 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 53.1260098522 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 11.5310837438 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.21 8.32886699507 123% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 55.0591133005 185% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.