Some universities deduct students marks if work is given late. What is your opinion and recommend some alternative actions for this problem?
With the advancement of technology, there are myriad change seen in the field of education. Now, most the of universities started assignment based scoring on improvement of skills. Universities set a fixed date of submit their tasks within time, if pupils cannot submit their task on time, then teachers deduct their marks. I strongly accord this, universities should penalize the students, if they cannot submit their tasks with in time.
To begin with, fixing a deadline for submission any task will bring more responsibility and punctuality among the students and they motivate them to complete every tasks in their life on time. Furthermore, if universities do not strictly bring these rules then aspirants will careless and they cannot success in their life as a causal approach cannot bring success in life.
On the other hand, teachers must guide the students for timely completion for their respective jobs and asks regularly for the submission of their files before due date. Moreover, they should must guide the week students where they are lacking for completion of tasks. Last but not the least, universities may extend the time of completion task if someone has a solid reason for no submission tasks with in time.
In conclusion, universities should legally penalize the students if they are not completing their tasks on time. Moreover, universities strictly behave these rules if aspirants are not completing their tasks till fixed date.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 317, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...task on time, then teachers deduct their marks. I strongly accord this, universit...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, then, in conclusion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.5418719212 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 6.10837438424 196% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 5.94088669951 17% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1225.0 1207.87684729 101% => OK
No of words: 234.0 242.827586207 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23504273504 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73592734092 2.71678728327 101% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 139.433497537 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.504273504274 0.580463131201 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 372.6 379.143842365 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.9571165859 50.4703680194 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.363636364 104.977214359 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2727272727 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 7.25397266985 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0958732192343 0.242375264174 40% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.047763586064 0.0925447433944 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0243389518517 0.071462118173 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0683753847585 0.151781067708 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0218831850678 0.0609392437508 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 12.6369458128 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 11.5310837438 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.32886699507 95% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 55.0591133005 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.