Soon retirement of workers can create job opportunities for young people. Discuss
Give examples.
Recently, the phenomenon of creating job opportunities for young people and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matters of soon retirement are highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to conceive that young workers can be a plus, and I will investigate that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, soon retirement of workers can provide the society with noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as the advantages of creating job opportunities, are visible. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the importance of efficient employees. Thus, beneficial ramifications of brilliant opportunities are remarkable.
From a scientific point of view, soon retirement of employees can supply the community with negative impacts, which are associated with the reality that the demerits of inexperienced workers are crucial. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by an elite university described created job opportunities, Hence, predicted outcomes of old people are critical.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of creating job opportunities for young people far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of retiring old workers prove the significance of an energetic job, but also pinpoint possible implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1320.0 1207.87684729 109% => OK
No of words: 231.0 242.827586207 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.71428571429 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.34169413029 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623376623377 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 420.3 379.143842365 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9550907177 50.4703680194 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.0 104.977214359 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.25397266985 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.406148838979 0.242375264174 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136389055845 0.0925447433944 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0832265922268 0.071462118173 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23590043107 0.151781067708 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0525036585633 0.0609392437508 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 11.5310837438 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.66 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 55.0591133005 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.