There are several people travel to the foreign countries or bigger cities within their state for better education. While some brilliant people study locally, it is necessary to travel to a better city where educational institutes are good. This essay will discuss the necessity to travel for education, even though some people study locally.
There are several reasons why travel for the study is good. Firstly, the infrastructure in the big cities are far better than the education institutes in rural areas can provide. Students will have access to many state-of-the-art facilities in the more prominent colleges in the cities. For example, an MBA degree from Sanford college valued more than the degree from an ordinary college.Hence, cities offer good education for the students which is beneficial for their studies.
In spite of the above arguments, some people might promulgate the idea that traveling to a new place for education is superfluous. They assert that it involves cost thus expensive. For instance, a degree from a foreign educational institute would be expensive for the students to pay.Therefore, traveling for proper training has its detriments, but the benefits outweigh them in the long run.
In conclusion, the reasons why people travel to new places for a good education are countless, but the significant ones are better job opportunities and experiencing cultures. For those reasons, I believe that moving to a new place for study is vital for student's future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 389, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Hence
...han the degree from an ordinary college.Hence, cities offer good education for the st...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 285, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Therefore
...ld be expensive for the students to pay.Therefore, traveling for proper training has its ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, if, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 20.9802955665 62% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 31.9359605911 69% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1260.0 1207.87684729 104% => OK
No of words: 238.0 242.827586207 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29411764706 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9088863749 2.71678728327 107% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 139.433497537 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.550420168067 0.580463131201 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 401.4 379.143842365 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8362988385 50.4703680194 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.0 104.977214359 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8333333333 20.9669160288 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.41666666667 7.25397266985 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290832723631 0.242375264174 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127279844642 0.0925447433944 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0964210874113 0.071462118173 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193635130402 0.151781067708 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0530735290945 0.0609392437508 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 12.6369458128 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.1260098522 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 11.5310837438 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.32886699507 107% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 55.0591133005 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.