Nowadays, it has become a colossal trend to see that educational achievement plays a significant role in being selected by the high profile companies to work for them. There are myriad of academics who believe that degree holders will eventually make more money and thus they should not get the aid from the government in regards to their course fees. However, rest advocate otherwise. In this essay, I shall further elaborate both the sides which would lead to plausible conclusions.
At the outset, there is a deluge of arguments which favors the notion that highly educated students can afford to take the burden of the cost of their further courses on their own shoulders. Moreover, by achieving further educational milestones, they are expected to earn the extravagant amount of money than not so qualified aspirants. Furthermore, the government should concentrate more on the section of students who are not capable of shouldering the bulging cost of their education.
On the flip side, critics argue that by not following standard policy, the government would be making discrimination among students, which is not considered as a fair behavior. Furthermore, to reach this dignified level, pupils pour their heart and soul out into studies and thus their hard work should be paid off rather than considering it as a point for making partiality among students. Moving further on the same track, by doing so, the government will create an environment where students will get discouraged to take further courses and it will deteriorate the future of the individual citizen and the country as a whole.
To recapitulate, from the above-mentioned arguments one can conclude that the given notion would lead to discrimination and thus to avoid such unhealthy practices government should take proper actions to make sure that needy students do not get deprived from the deserved benefits.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 320, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: regarding; with regard to
...uld not get the aid from the government in regards to their course fees. However, rest advoca...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 6.10837438424 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 31.9359605911 135% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1593.0 1207.87684729 132% => OK
No of words: 305.0 242.827586207 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22295081967 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88491801416 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 139.433497537 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570491803279 0.580463131201 98% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 379.143842365 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.65517241379 219% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.4251038758 50.4703680194 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.818181818 104.977214359 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7272727273 20.9669160288 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.25397266985 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 6.9802955665 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13290583239 0.242375264174 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0509062508289 0.0925447433944 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0426313363999 0.071462118173 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0814629186965 0.151781067708 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0545430239664 0.0609392437508 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 53.1260098522 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 11.5310837438 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 55.0591133005 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.