Study a Particular Area of Climate Change: global warming or environmental problems
Recently, the phenomenon of climate change and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that tackling environmental problems is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that considering the climate change can be a plus, and I will analyze it throughout this essay.
From the sociological standpoint, raising awareness among the mass media can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that human benefits, as well as our responsibility to nature, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered renewable energies, electrical cars and low-energy technologies can reduce the air pollution. Thus, beneficial ramifications of protecting both ozone layer and atmosphere apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of psychological science, global warming might increase the consequences of rising sea levels and melting glaciers. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of greenhouse gases such as carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide relate to this reality that the demerits of creating the hole in ozone layer pertain to the excessive use of fossil fuels and gases emitted from transportation and coal or gas-fired power plants. As a tangible example, scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of drought and water shortage is correlated negatively with the carbon footprint. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notions of the global warming.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of the alternative source of transportation far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of protecting Mother Nature prove the significance of it, but also pinpoint devastating global implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1696.0 1207.87684729 140% => OK
No of words: 299.0 242.827586207 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.67224080268 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25700997898 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 139.433497537 143% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.665551839465 0.580463131201 115% => OK
syllable_count: 544.5 379.143842365 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.7779963525 50.4703680194 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.333333333 104.977214359 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9166666667 20.9669160288 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 7.25397266985 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0978857039171 0.242375264174 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.033723851808 0.0925447433944 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0364768165706 0.071462118173 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0509871828557 0.151781067708 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0415726138656 0.0609392437508 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 12.6369458128 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 11.5310837438 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.22 8.32886699507 135% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 55.0591133005 220% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.