The ability to learn more than one language will be less important in future. Do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of learning various languages has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that being bilingual is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of the individual. I am inclined to believe that acquiring the knowledge of other languages can be a pulse, and I will analyze it throughout this essay.
From the multilingualism standpoint, learning a second language can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that higher numbers of job opportunities, as well as better communication skill, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered newly graduates who are capable of establishing effective communications other than their mother tongue, are more successful in their job interviews. Thus, the beneficial ramification of both conversation and achievement apparently can be seen.
In addition, within the realm of linguistics science, knowing more than one language might increase the result of improving the economy. Moreover, tourists visit countries because of their diversity in the languages, cultures, festivals, art and history. So, fundamental aspects of this idea are correlated to this reality that merits of economical boom pertain to globalization. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that learning another language than native languages such as dominant ones namely English, France and Arabic, can have essential influences on international trades and travels. Hence, So it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of bilingualism.
To put it in a nutshell, I pen down concluding that acquisition of the knowledge of foreign languages will be emphasized in foreseeable future. So, not only the advantages of this knowledge prove its significance, but also pinpoint career implication.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, second, so, thus, well, in addition, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1703.0 1207.87684729 141% => OK
No of words: 299.0 242.827586207 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.69565217391 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.34335097946 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 139.433497537 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.655518394649 0.580463131201 113% => OK
syllable_count: 545.4 379.143842365 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.3597867822 50.4703680194 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.0 104.977214359 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.69230769231 7.25397266985 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213311031841 0.242375264174 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0649654479322 0.0925447433944 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0588978384582 0.071462118173 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11752462685 0.151781067708 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0244099806778 0.0609392437508 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 12.6369458128 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.08 11.5310837438 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.9 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 55.0591133005 211% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.