Money Spent on Space Exploration
Recently, the phenomenon of spending a huge amount of budget in space exploring and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that spending robots and satellites to other planets is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that research on mars and moon can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the sociological standpoint, continuing to research the outer space can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that increasing population, as well as finding an extra accommodation outside Earth, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the possibility of life on other galaxies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both discovering unresolved mysterious of the universe and protecting Earth from danger apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of psychological science, space traveling might increase the consequences of wasting money and time. Moreover, fundamental aspects of serious problems in health, education, and employment relate to this reality that the demerits of lack of proper education and food pertain to some basic needs. As a tangible example, scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of crucial environmental problems is correlated negatively with poor financial aids. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of poverty and starvation.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of space researches far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of contact aliens in space prove the significance of spending billions of dollars on space programs, but also pinpoint finding alternative fuels implications
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 203, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'extra accommodation'.
Suggestion: extra accommodation
...creasing population, as well as finding an extra accommodation outside Earth, are inextricably bound u...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 31.9359605911 138% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1683.0 1207.87684729 139% => OK
No of words: 299.0 242.827586207 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.62876254181 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21141296484 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 139.433497537 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.652173913043 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 533.7 379.143842365 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.2378732234 50.4703680194 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.25 104.977214359 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9166666667 20.9669160288 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152438943685 0.242375264174 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0483967704561 0.0925447433944 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.065568602717 0.071462118173 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0812424179766 0.151781067708 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0366000449109 0.0609392437508 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 12.6369458128 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.67 11.5310837438 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.9 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 55.0591133005 209% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.