Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are a role model for youngsters. Do you support it or not?
Recently the phenomenon of glamorous film or sports stars and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of following accomplished characters is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the influence of famous film or sports figures can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, well-known film characters can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that imitating their lifestyle by adolescents, as well as following their attitudes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the influence of glamorous film or sports stars on youngsters’ education. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both recognizing adolescent’s talent in terms of art and bringing popularity to the country apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of film stars as a role model for the young generation, the behavior of actors might increase the consequences of criminal activities. Moreover, Fundamental aspects of committing a crime would relate to this reality that the demerits of following their lifestyle pertain to the lack of concentration on education. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of imitating accomplished sportsman is correlated negatively with lack of attention to the education. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion wrong role model.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of glamorous film stars outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of increasing the motivation of young people in terms of art prove the significance of popularity, but also pinpoint social implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 31.9359605911 138% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1718.0 1207.87684729 142% => OK
No of words: 306.0 242.827586207 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61437908497 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 3.92707691288 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.36507379496 2.71678728327 124% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 139.433497537 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591503267974 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 541.8 379.143842365 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.9508991382 50.4703680194 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.166666667 104.977214359 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5 20.9669160288 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247112729041 0.242375264174 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0860619922369 0.0925447433944 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0896173935484 0.071462118173 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136630692214 0.151781067708 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0208218373751 0.0609392437508 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 12.6369458128 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 53.1260098522 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 11.5310837438 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.4 8.32886699507 125% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 55.0591133005 194% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.