Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are a role model for youngsters. Do u support it or not? (Agree/Disagree)
These days, there is a heated debate among people about the importance of imitating the celebrities. There are a great number of individuals who interpret the impacts of emulating famous people as thoroughly constructive, while others hold an opponent’s view. I am inclined to believe that imitating the celebrities has some positive impacts on youngsters, while it can adversely influence adolescents’ characteristics.
There is no skepticism surrounding the fact that celebrities are excellent role model due to their outstanding performance and achievement. Furthermore, well-known people such as actors, musicians and football players are industrious and tenacious to achieve their goals. Hence, they play a pivotal role in creating a feeling of accomplishment in youngsters to do uphill struggle in learning something new. To be more specific, a survey conducted by Yale University in 2015 has found that following the celebrities could enhance people’s intellectual ability to make decision related to their social and personal life.
On the other hand, seeing stars as role model also have a number of downsides. To be more precise, youngsters start getting inspired from negative role models and imitating the same act at home or in streets can have a severe impact on the society. Moreover, youth following their path can result in destruction of ethical values of a society. The data yielded by a current study in Melbourne University has shown that emulating the negative attitudes of celebrities increases violence and crime in California.
In a nutshell, the foregoing discussion propounds the view that celebrities can be inspiring to other people, while they might have harmful effect on young generation’s behavior. From my point of view, the merits of imitating the celebrities far outweigh its drawbacks.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, so, well, while, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1574.0 1207.87684729 130% => OK
No of words: 282.0 242.827586207 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58156028369 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30072323965 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 139.433497537 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617021276596 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 379.143842365 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6341255148 50.4703680194 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.076923077 104.977214359 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6923076923 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.38461538462 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0854831932102 0.242375264174 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0328466288648 0.0925447433944 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0539005148334 0.071462118173 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0457059367228 0.151781067708 30% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.040346737219 0.0609392437508 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 12.6369458128 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.1260098522 78% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 11.5310837438 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.83 8.32886699507 118% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 55.0591133005 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.94827586207 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.