TEM AND SEM ANALYSIS
Fig. 1 illustrates the morphological properties of GO, TNT and GO/TNT through TEM and SEM analysis. As shown in Fig. 1(a) and (b), GO appeared with layer structure and each dimensional size about 2-4 micrometer. Fig. 1(c) and (e) indicate that TiO2 nanotubes were successfully fabricated with several hundred nanometers in length and 8 nm in diameter. In the GO/TNT composite, as shown in Fig. 1(d) and (f), the heterojunction between GO and TNT would be generated thanks to the chemical bonding including Ti-C or Ti-O-C. Hence, when irradiation arrived, the easier photoelectrons transferred from TNT to GO, the longer lifetime of excited carriers was prolonged. As a consequence, the photocatalytic performance for degradation of organic pollutants was enhanced [5, 6]. As mentioned in many previous works [7-9], the curling and scrolling process of TiO2 nanosheets during the hydrothermal treatment played a crucial role in the formation of TiO2 nanotubes. Additionally, when in situ composting TNT with GO, TiO2 and GO sheets have a tendency to aggregate and unequally disperse in water due to the hydrogen bond (H-bond) and van der Waals attraction [10, 11]. Therefore, on one hand, the TNT’s length in GO/TNT composite was slightly reduced. On the other hand, the specific surface area of GO/TNT was also decreased, as shown in table 1
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-03-06 | miigky990903 | 11 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 326, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...several hundred nanometers in length and 8 nm in diameter. In the GO/TNT composit...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, if, so, therefore, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.5418719212 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 6.10837438424 16% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 8.36945812808 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 1.0 20.9802955665 5% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1114.0 1207.87684729 92% => OK
No of words: 216.0 242.827586207 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15740740741 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15101993199 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 139.433497537 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648148148148 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 326.7 379.143842365 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 4.6157635468 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 1.56157635468 448% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 7.0 1.71428571429 408% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.9122338496 50.4703680194 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.8333333333 104.977214359 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.9669160288 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.08333333333 7.25397266985 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.12807881773 24% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0369045712501 0.242375264174 15% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0158885528812 0.0925447433944 17% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0526963683688 0.071462118173 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0369045712501 0.151781067708 24% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0609392437508 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 12.6369458128 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.1260098522 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.9458128079 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 11.5310837438 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.32886699507 111% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 55.0591133005 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.