There are more men or women in certain jobs and there's nothing we can change about it. Do you agree with that?
Recently, the phenomenon of jobs for men and women has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "Can we change anything about it?". Whereas, it is a widely held view that gender equality is beneficial. I will discuss the controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the employment standpoint, sex discrimination is bound up inextricably with jobs, which indicates they lead to both careers and incentives. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2011 demonstrates the relationship between bread-winners and important occupations as well as an exponential increase in the labor force. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of employers is correlated positively with not only versatile employees but also male chauvinists.
Within the realm of the economy, without the slightest doubt, women's participation attribute to productive industries, in that it would come down to wages, bonuses, and experts. A salient example of such attribution is special careers, which is a cause of concern since it was mistaken to take revenues for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars have had the opportunity to pinpoint competitions problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to stereotypes, traditional ideas, and even financial rewards. Hence, it is correct to infer the pivotal role of considering women as the professional workforce.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well, after analyzing what elaborated above, I entirely agree that society should provide equal job opportunities for men and women. Meanwhile, local authorities are recommended to enforce some strict legislation, and individuals are hoped to heighten their intellect.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 176, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...Can we change anything about it?'. Whereas, it is a widely held view that gender e...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, while, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1624.0 1207.87684729 134% => OK
No of words: 283.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.73851590106 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26745660211 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 139.433497537 146% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.717314487633 0.580463131201 124% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 379.143842365 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.7855209739 50.4703680194 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.0 104.977214359 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2142857143 20.9669160288 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 7.25397266985 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167586141814 0.242375264174 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0408722378003 0.0925447433944 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0807910444594 0.071462118173 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0997337755104 0.151781067708 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0816145406648 0.0609392437508 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 12.6369458128 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.01 11.5310837438 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.04 8.32886699507 133% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 55.0591133005 209% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.94827586207 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.