The time people devote in job leaves very little time for personal life. How widespread is the problem. What problem will this shortage of time causes.
Nowadays, the lack of personal life has become a major concern in modern society. On topic under debate is that people devoted too much in job. This essay will illustrate this social problem in terms of how widespread it is and what problem it will cause.
To start with, it is generally believed that the problem of lacking leisure time is widespread in most of the jobs. For example, teachers are required to take extra classes during the weekend due to the competitive situation between schools. Another example illustrating this point is that doctors are on call even in the middle of night in case of emergency. Therefore, this is not the only problem for certain career but for the whole society.
Obviously, the reducing personal time bring harms to individuals both physically and mentally. Lacking personal time also means lacking family time. If employees cannot share enough time with their parents or children, they would get depressed leading to other metal disorder or even physical illnesses. This is especially true when we consider the single parent family or family of young child aging below five.
In conclusion, the growth of working time has created serious problems for both individual and the society. Accordingly, some steps must be taken to reverse this trend immediately. Such measures may include establishing law regarding maximum working hours and harsh punishment for companies breaking it.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, if, may, regarding, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.75862068966 35% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1202.0 1207.87684729 100% => OK
No of words: 231.0 242.827586207 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20346320346 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58390431977 2.71678728327 95% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 139.433497537 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.670995670996 0.580463131201 116% => OK
syllable_count: 370.8 379.143842365 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.5024630542 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.6018451102 50.4703680194 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 85.8571428571 104.977214359 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5 20.9669160288 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 7.25397266985 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 2.75862068966 254% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.404956046578 0.242375264174 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11817386278 0.0925447433944 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0922651427192 0.071462118173 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217397704149 0.151781067708 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0697300388736 0.0609392437508 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 12.6369458128 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.1260098522 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.9458128079 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 11.5310837438 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 55.0591133005 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.3980295567 81% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 63.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.