Tobacco mainly in the form of cigarettes is one of the most widely used drug in the world. Over a billion adult smoke tobacco everyday. The long term health costs are high- for smokers themselves and and for the wider communities in term of health care cost and lost productivity.
Do governments have a legitimate role to legislate to protect citizens from the harmful effects of their own decisions to smoke, or are such decisions up to the individual?
Outlawing tobacco use would create unprecedented controversy. Billions of people worldwide smoke; whether they are chain smokers or recreational smokers. also, there are several multi-million dollar cigarette companies that will also suffer many consequences if tobacco use is made illegal. We must also consider the thousands of employees who will be left unemployed if such a legislation is made. Unfortunately, it is an industry that makes ridiculous amounts of money for many people, so the likelihood of banning it is minimal.
Nonetheless, it is a change that would benefit society on many levels in the long run. smoking causes so many health care issues, so if smoking is made illegal, morbidity and mortality rates would be reduced significantly. Quality of life will be improved dramatically, and it will allow more people to enjoy their lives significantly longer.
Legislators must also consider the rights of the individual. Should’nt every individual have the right to choose how they treat their body? The government can argue that these individuals may do as they wish, but then they must also suffer the consequences without government funding. they must take full responsibility for any health issues developed as a result of tobacco use, and not expect medicare or health insurance to cover costs caused by their own irresponsible negligent decisions.
In essence, if individuals wish to make their own decisions to smoke, they must consider all the possible outcomes, and be willing to deal with these outcomes accordingly.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-12-07 | ptemaster2018 | 77 | view |
| 2018-04-08 | Anonymous | 11 | view |
- Some people think placing advertisements in schools is a great resource for public schools that need additional funding, but others think it exploits children by treating them as a captive audience for corporate sponsors.Choose which position you most agr 55
- nothing 11
- You have eaten at a restaurant and it was such a terrible experience that you have decided to inform the manager by letter of what happened, and that you want your money back. Things to include:– Facts. You need to be concise but explain what happened. 89
- A HEALTHY DIET IS MORE IMPORTANT FOR KEEPING FIT THAN EXERCISE TO WHAT EXTENT DO YOU AGREE WITH THIS STATEMENT GIVE EXAMPLE OR PERSONAL EXPERIENCES 72
- The prevention of health problems and illness is more important than treatment and medicine. Government funding should reflect this. To what extend do you agree or disagree. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 155, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Also
... chain smokers or recreational smokers. also, there are several multi-million dollar...
^^^^
Line 2, column 87, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Smoking
...society on many levels in the long run. smoking causes so many health care issues, so i...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 105, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun health seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much health', 'a good deal of health'.
Suggestion: much health; a good deal of health
...vels in the long run. smoking causes so many health care issues, so if smoking is made ille...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 290, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...onsequences without government funding. they must take full responsibility for any h...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, if, may, nonetheless, so, then, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 6.10837438424 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 31.9359605911 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1311.0 1207.87684729 109% => OK
No of words: 243.0 242.827586207 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3950617284 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0859643011 2.71678728327 114% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 139.433497537 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641975308642 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 419.4 379.143842365 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.931034482759 430% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2375137997 50.4703680194 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.846153846 104.977214359 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6923076923 20.9669160288 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.15384615385 7.25397266985 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141075967286 0.242375264174 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0495748359859 0.0925447433944 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0553335879527 0.071462118173 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.077900579136 0.151781067708 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.03970329249 0.0609392437508 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 12.6369458128 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.1260098522 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 11.5310837438 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.32886699507 107% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 55.0591133005 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.94827586207 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.