Traveling by air among rich and ordinary people.To but extent do you agree or disagree?
The importance of air traveling by air among rich and ordinary people which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while other reject this notion. This essay will further elaborate both aspect of this trend and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
There are myriad of reason which will further explain this argument but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that the traveling that beneficial the rich people because they visit other countries by air as well as they have more money for traveling therefore they like to air travel they export business for other countries. Another pivotal aspect of this argument is that because rich have enjoyment in their life with money and therefore they like travel. Needless to say, all these merits stand in a good stead.
However, there are some pitfall that negate these argument and which can certainly overwhelm the potential influence of this trend but one of the most alarming one is that poor ordinary people not traveling by air because he not afford the air ticket. Besides, poor people have no money and because of that they never traveling outside the country.
According to the argument aforementioned above, one can reach a conclusion that the benefit of traveling by air rich among ordinary people are instrument indeed. Nevertheless, its potential drawbacks should not be overlooked either.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 219, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hey visit other countries by air as well as they have more money for traveling th...
^^
Line 3, column 313, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... like to air travel they export business for other countries. Another pivotal asp...
^^^
Line 5, column 25, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'pitfalls'?
Suggestion: pitfalls
...a good stead. However, there are some pitfall that negate these argument and which ca...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 45, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this argument' or 'these arguments'?
Suggestion: this argument; these arguments
...ver, there are some pitfall that negate these argument and which can certainly overwhelm the p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 193, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...larming one is that poor ordinary people not traveling by air because he not affo...
^^
Line 5, column 231, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[3]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'affords'.
Suggestion: affords
...le not traveling by air because he not afford the air ticket. Besides, poor people ha...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 235, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...wbacks should not be overlooked either.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, however, if, look, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 20.9802955665 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1198.0 1207.87684729 99% => OK
No of words: 234.0 242.827586207 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11965811966 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53935349376 2.71678728327 93% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 139.433497537 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525641025641 0.580463131201 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 376.2 379.143842365 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6551724138 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 87.2834180227 50.4703680194 173% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.111111111 104.977214359 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 20.9669160288 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.77777777778 7.25397266985 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.33497536946 131% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195824540259 0.242375264174 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0850886148714 0.0925447433944 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0776586155781 0.071462118173 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136840342123 0.151781067708 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0233123375342 0.0609392437508 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 12.6369458128 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 53.1260098522 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.5310837438 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.32886699507 100% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 55.0591133005 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 9.94827586207 191% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.