Trying to save endangered species from extinction is a waste of valuable resources, do you agree or disagree?
The world has become more of a human-dominated planet. Us, human beings are consuming the resources of the earth so much depriving the other animals, birds, and insects to die and eventually become extinct. As this world is becoming a more dangerous place for those species because of us, we have the key responsibility to fix what we have destroyed. In this essay, I will discuss why spending resources and money are crucial and not a waste to save those endangered animals.
Earth was flourishing with natural habitats and greeneries everywhere until the human civilization boomed. Since then a lot of industrialization happened which led to extensive deforestation. That in effect has resulted in the extinction of many animals and birds species. Our governments should spend time and lucre to control the cutting down of trees and take measures to limit the factories and industries.
Moreover, we have hunted down wild animals for our monetary benefits. The excessive hunting of animals like whales, rhinos, tigers, and lions has caused their numbers to reduce drastically. Without spending our valuable resources for these gracious and beautiful animals those cannot be protected and our younger generations will only see get to them in pictures and movies.
In conclusion, we should fix what we have broken by joining hands and working together and without hesitating for spending resources for the beings that are about to vanish from the face of the earth. Earth is our only home and all living creatures have the right to live and we must live in harmony by taking care of them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-04 | shankaraviji | 11 | view |
- Governments should reduce their investments in arts, music, and painting. Do you agree or disagree? 55
- Parents should be held legally responsible for their children’s acts. What is YOUR opinion? Support it with personal examples. 55
- The traditional subjects are soon moving off since last few years in schools. Kindly provide the solutions and ideas to save such subjects. 61
- Trying to save endangered species from extinction is a waste of valuable resources, do you agree or disagree? 11
- Should there be a variety of learning methodologies implemented within the school learning curriculum Or Discuss the types of teaching methods and their advantages and disadvantages 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 108, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...re until the human civilization boomed. Since then a lot of industrialization happene...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, then, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 8.36945812808 203% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1335.0 1207.87684729 111% => OK
No of words: 263.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07604562738 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8093790865 2.71678728327 103% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600760456274 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 417.6 379.143842365 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4469076512 50.4703680194 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.692307692 104.977214359 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2307692308 20.9669160288 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.84615384615 7.25397266985 39% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0668944928129 0.242375264174 28% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.023307344209 0.0925447433944 25% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0348014420279 0.071462118173 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0363883013455 0.151781067708 24% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0292117482915 0.0609392437508 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 12.6369458128 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.1260098522 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 11.5310837438 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.32886699507 103% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 55.0591133005 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.