unauthorized behavior is not acceptable in the workplace give your opinion
The effect of unauthorised behaviour, which was always debatable, has now become more controversial. The substantial infuence of belching and unaccepted behaviuor has sparked the controversy over the potential impact of this trend on people in modern offices in the recent years. It can be said that unacceptable is worse in everywhere even start from small business to expanded entreprises, it has drawbacks as well. This essay will elaborate how this typpe of behaviour is not accepted in the world and how it can reduce efficiency and producivity in modern business environment and thus lead to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why this kind of nature is not authorised, but the most conpicuous one stems from the fact that not only it spoils the whole environment in business but also harms business reputation, ultimatley business entity goes down. For example, if any employee do this type of behaviour in workplace that effects other staff members as well, which continue grows in the environment. So it is elixir to prevent such type of behaviour.
Another key justification for upholding the key notion is that it also reduce productivity due to employees misbehave and others can not concentrate on work and sometimes people have deadlines to complete the certain taske. For instance, Bulling and harrassment is also this type of behavious, which is unacceptable in the world. Hence, it puts pressure on whole environment which is not acceptable anywhere in the world.
From what has been discussed above, it can be said that the impact of this type of behaiour is prominent although the way it effects other should be well handled.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 396, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ff members as well, which continue grows in the environment. So it is elixir to p...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, for example, for instance, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1411.0 1207.87684729 117% => OK
No of words: 275.0 242.827586207 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13090909091 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91469006617 2.71678728327 107% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574545454545 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 379.143842365 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.3150132757 50.4703680194 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.272727273 104.977214359 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.9669160288 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.54545454545 7.25397266985 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0321767077366 0.242375264174 13% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0140711494189 0.0925447433944 15% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0238312139442 0.071462118173 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0184234640332 0.151781067708 12% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0107998948678 0.0609392437508 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 12.6369458128 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 53.1260098522 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.9458128079 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 11.5310837438 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.32886699507 108% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 55.0591133005 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.