Recently, unauthorized behaviour in workplace by the employees had sparked heated debate among individuals. Though some argue that this can be neglected, I profoundly believe that these kinds of behaviour has a negative impact on the business and need to be curbed in the initial stage. In this essay, I shall elaborate my point of view with concrete examples and a conclusion.
From a business standpoint, unauthorized activity is totally unacceptable as it will tarnish the image of the firm, bring down the productivity and rarely it may lead to regulatory actions on the company which allowed unauthorized behaviour. As a tangible example, if a company does not monitor the internet usage of the employees, some workers may misuse the resource and send emails and use social media during office hours. They may also threaten a third party through email or social media from office. This will, in turn, cause a great damage to the reputation of the firm and is also answerable to the regulatory authorities.
From the realm of business, the company will suffer a great loss due to the productivity loss. On the other hand, the company will also lose valuable customers. Based on a longitudinal research done last year by research students have determined that revenue 70% of the companies that do not control the unauthorized behaviour had dropped drastically.
To recapitulate, it is essential for the management to take action on the employees for any kind of unauthorized behaviour and should be monitored continuously.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 534, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'great damage'.
Suggestion: great damage
... from office. This will, in turn, cause a great damage to the reputation of the firm and is al...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, so, third, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.5418719212 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.75862068966 35% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1292.0 1207.87684729 107% => OK
No of words: 249.0 242.827586207 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18875502008 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00576587141 2.71678728327 111% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602409638554 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 415.8 379.143842365 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.696730282 50.4703680194 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.454545455 104.977214359 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6363636364 20.9669160288 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.72727272727 7.25397266985 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0728472458355 0.242375264174 30% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0274280974712 0.0925447433944 30% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0419884686298 0.071462118173 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0441847842266 0.151781067708 29% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0116324785465 0.0609392437508 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 12.6369458128 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 11.5310837438 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 55.0591133005 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.