We have entered a throw-away society and fill the environment with rubbish. What are the causes and what are your solutions?
Recently, the phenomenon of "we have entered a throw-away society and fill the environment with rubbish" and its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debating the proposition that a throw-away society might be remarkably fruitful, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a remarkable number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that reusing rubbish can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the economics standpoint, entering a throw-away society can provide the society with profound effects, which might stem from the fact that purchasing new goods and increasing the income are inextricably bound up. Regarding my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the effects of recycling rubbish on society's economy. Thus, invaluable ramifications of both producing more products and using natural resources distinctly can be observed.
Within the realm of environment preservation, without the slightest doubt, filling the environment with rubbish might exacerbate the already catastrophic consequences of environmental issues. Moreover, fundamental aspects of a throw-away society can relate to the reality that the demerits of producing rubbish can pertain to the soil pollution. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that if the downsides of using rubbish were correlated positively with appropriate recycling methods, the local authorities would ultimately address decreasing landfill numbers. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the preconceived notion of promoting the society's insights.
To conclude, despite several compelling arguments on both sides, I opt vigorously to support the idea that the demerits of a throw-away society and filling the environment with rubbish far outweigh its merits.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 157, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nd its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1664.0 1207.87684729 138% => OK
No of words: 281.0 242.827586207 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.92170818505 5.00649968141 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26301724932 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 139.433497537 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615658362989 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 522.9 379.143842365 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.1764330449 50.4703680194 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.272727273 104.977214359 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5454545455 20.9669160288 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45454545455 7.25397266985 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31205735138 0.242375264174 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113160688229 0.0925447433944 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.087422247919 0.071462118173 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198592181345 0.151781067708 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0385533273267 0.0609392437508 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.2 12.6369458128 152% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 20.72 53.1260098522 39% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 10.9458128079 152% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.35 11.5310837438 150% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.06 8.32886699507 133% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 55.0591133005 200% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.