The effect of living in big cities rather than rural areas, which was always debatable, has now become more controversial. The substantial influence of benefits of living in huge metropolis has sparked the controversy over the potential impact of this trend on the problems that rural zones deal with in recent years. It can be agreed that living in developed cities has some positive impacts, but some people claim that there are problems in rural areas has some negative impacts as well. This essay will elaborate how better infrastructures, job opportunities and help from government and local councils can help to solve the problems in rural areas, and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why people rather to live in big cities, but the most conspicuous stems from the fact that in rural areas the lack of job opportunities is a reason why people decide to get a job in big cities. For instance, thousands of people live in Sydney because it has the highest job market in Australia. Job markets, therefore, can play a vital role to move to urban areas.
Nevertheless, some people adopt an opposing view and tend to believe that rural regions is also significant with problems as there are innumerable reasons for that, but the most pre-dominat one lies in the fact that the lack of infrastructures. As a illustration, rural areas do not have roads which connect them with others important cities which creates lack of tourism and commerce. However, government and local council should invest more money in developing infrastructure in order to enhance the look of the rural areas.
From what has been discussed above, it can be concluded that the impact of the lack of development in rural zones is prominent, although it has some drawbacks that should be handled well.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 249, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ct that the lack of infrastructures. As a illustration, rural areas do not have r...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 31.9359605911 138% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1523.0 1207.87684729 126% => OK
No of words: 308.0 242.827586207 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94480519481 5.00649968141 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 3.92707691288 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78228946679 2.71678728327 102% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519480519481 0.580463131201 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 473.4 379.143842365 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.931034482759 430% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 20.5024630542 137% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.8450096161 50.4703680194 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.454545455 104.977214359 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 20.9669160288 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.54545454545 7.25397266985 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.361575049363 0.242375264174 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117493343901 0.0925447433944 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.058007557991 0.071462118173 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198245586907 0.151781067708 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0585792372936 0.0609392437508 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 12.6369458128 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 53.1260098522 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.9458128079 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 11.5310837438 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.32886699507 107% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 55.0591133005 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.3980295567 127% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 67.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.