What are the strengths and weaknesses of the public transport in your country?
In this modern world, transportation makes a significant affect on human life. Some people argue that they prefer private transportation than public transportation. In this essay, I shall discuss on the strengthens and weaknesses of the public transportation in my country together with my suggestions on eliminating weaknesses.
Firstly, we will look at the strengthens of the public transportation to a particular country. Countries can reduce their carbon emmission by decreasing private vehicles on the road as a result of a good public transportation. For example, in my country public transportation is provided in a concessionary rate to encourage people to utilize it more at the motive of decreasing vehicular pollution and decreasing the usage of petroleum resources as well. In addition, this move will help to prevent currency outflow of a particular country because petroleum resources are the main importing items of a country.
On the other hand, in my country public transportation does not provide comfortness to the commuter. Consequently, people does not prefer to use public transportation compared with the private transportation. Apart from that, in my country public transportation does not have a proper tome table. Therefore, people experience difficulties in planning there journeys using public transportation.
In conclusion, it is recommended governments to buy new vehicles for the public transportation to increase availability. It is believed, if governments can maintain the coaches in a regular manner, they will be able to attract more people to them increasing the revenue to the government.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 58, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...rld, transportation makes a significant affect on human life. Some people argue that they...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 178, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a regular manner" with adverb for "regular"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...if governments can maintain the coaches in a regular manner, they will be able to attract more peop...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, if, look, so, then, therefore, well, apart from, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.5418719212 47% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 8.36945812808 24% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 5.94088669951 34% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 31.9359605911 128% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 5.75862068966 295% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1394.0 1207.87684729 115% => OK
No of words: 247.0 242.827586207 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.64372469636 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.57692250412 2.71678728327 132% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 139.433497537 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53036437247 0.580463131201 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 427.5 379.143842365 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.65517241379 246% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7980492736 50.4703680194 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.230769231 104.977214359 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.9669160288 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5384615385 7.25397266985 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305107924604 0.242375264174 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12425339476 0.0925447433944 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0641082441441 0.071462118173 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189500620753 0.151781067708 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0719295407698 0.0609392437508 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 12.6369458128 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.1260098522 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 11.5310837438 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 55.0591133005 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.