What is your view on the idea that it takes failure to achieve success?
Recently, the phenomenon of accepting failure to accomplishing success and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that matter of continuous effort is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that learning from experience can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, failure is the start of success can provide society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of tolerance of the defeat, as well as finding the reasons for this failure, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student. I have tried to find the obstacles after failing some courses. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both problem-solving and figuring out the defects apparently can be seen.
On the other hand, within the realm of psychology, experiencing failures might increase the consequences of disappointment. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of repetition of unpleasant situations could relate to this reality that the demerits of frustration pertain to the wrong way. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by UCLA university has asserted that the downside of satisfaction is associated with acquiring practical lessons. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of rehabilitation after a collapse.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of taking failure as an essential part of success far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of learning unprecedented experience prove the significance of finding main factors, but also pinpoint persistent efforts implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, in fact, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 31.9359605911 132% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1558.0 1207.87684729 129% => OK
No of words: 278.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.60431654676 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31983014488 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 139.433497537 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.654676258993 0.580463131201 113% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 379.143842365 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.6286532977 50.4703680194 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.846153846 104.977214359 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3846153846 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07692307692 7.25397266985 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101933041943 0.242375264174 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0295395751151 0.0925447433944 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0477971322421 0.071462118173 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.058589320016 0.151781067708 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0272276820141 0.0609392437508 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.2 11.5310837438 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.81 8.32886699507 130% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 55.0591133005 196% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.