Whether design of building will have a positive or negative impact on people's life and work?
Recently, the phenomenon of the modern architectural methods for designing buildings and its corresponding impacts on the inhabitants' life and working conditions has sparked a heated debate. Although these techniques are beneficial as they regarded by the substantial number of individuals both constructive and positive, others hold opponent views. I am inclined to believe that this issue can be plus as it could develop some brilliant aspects for its adherents.
From a social standpoint, constructing the well-designed buildings can provide the society with noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact of boosting the people's life and working circumstances. From my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered these influences. Firstly, utilizing the modern methods for designing the internal structure of buildings can improve the working environment and enhance the employees' productivity and efficiency. Furthermore, the modern designs for external structure of buildings create fantastic appearance of the city and they lead to attracting tourists which is boosting the economy. Moreover, these amazing techniques can develop positive attitudes among the citizens and enhance the settlers' satisfaction.
On the one hand, there is no doubt the idea of using modern styles for building has some opponents. They asserted that people have some other priorities including health, education, security and well-paid jobs and the budget which is devoted to the buildings' designes can be spent in other aspects.
In conclusion, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the merits of designing the internal and external structure of buildings in order to improve the inhabitatnts' life and working conditions are far more outweigh their demerits.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 123, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'inhabitants'' or 'inhabitant's'?
Suggestion: inhabitants'; inhabitant's
...gs and its corresponding impacts on the inhabitants life and working conditions has sparked...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 161, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
... are rooted in the fact of boosting the peoples life and working circumstances. From my...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 468, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'employees'' or 'employee's'?
Suggestion: employees'; employee's
...the working environment and enhance the employees productivity and efficiency. Furthermor...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 784, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'settlers'' or 'settler's'?
Suggestion: settlers'; settler's
...udes among the citizens and enhance the settlers satisfaction. On the one hand, ther...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, so, well, while, in conclusion, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 31.9359605911 78% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1583.0 1207.87684729 131% => OK
No of words: 276.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.73550724638 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08856144916 2.71678728327 114% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 139.433497537 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586956521739 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 379.143842365 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.3462032832 50.4703680194 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.909090909 104.977214359 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0909090909 20.9669160288 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.54545454545 7.25397266985 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23600920409 0.242375264174 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0853185898339 0.0925447433944 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.071892563871 0.071462118173 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136996710761 0.151781067708 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0225687271741 0.0609392437508 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 12.6369458128 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 53.1260098522 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.31 11.5310837438 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.37 8.32886699507 125% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 55.0591133005 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.