Whether design of buildings will have a positive or negative impact on people’s life and work ?
The contemporary living style in the modern buildings has sparked controversies with many people claiming that these new architectures have a great effect on the lives of people. Although some people argue that modern designs have created a hap-hazard living environment, I believe that changes in the structures of the buildings have a significant positive impact on people. This essay will further elaborate on both sides and thus, will lead to a logical conclusion.
First and foremost, the mushrooming of the buildings in the urban cities have cut the options of natural greenery and an openness to the environment. It is believed that people who live in the countryside, where there is an access to parks and green spaces are more lively and full of energy. Secondly, the compact housing has led to privacy issues as people no longer feel free and live under restriction. Last but not least, these big buildings are more prone to natural calamities like earthquakes and therefore, people are in constant fear.
On the contrary, the city-dwelling units are more spacious and make use of each and every corner of the house. Take, for instance, the modern layout of city houses have spaces for separate servant room, garage, study room for children and common community parks to interact with people. For this reason, people feel safe and secure in such buildings and that make them balanced in their work life.
This essay discussed the modern day architecture and its proximity to nature and how they keep people away from stress. In my opinion, the city housing offers a happy experience to the people and cater to the needs of the existing world.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 221, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'access'.
Suggestion: access
...live in the countryside, where there is an access to parks and green spaces are more live...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, in my opinion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.5418719212 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 8.36945812808 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1383.0 1207.87684729 114% => OK
No of words: 277.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99277978339 5.00649968141 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63377133097 2.71678728327 97% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 139.433497537 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58844765343 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 379.143842365 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 6.0 1.56157635468 384% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.0308985797 50.4703680194 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.25 104.977214359 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0833333333 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.75 7.25397266985 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247424150577 0.242375264174 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0829033619267 0.0925447433944 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0726455278261 0.071462118173 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132903047405 0.151781067708 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.078215042418 0.0609392437508 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 12.6369458128 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.1260098522 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.5310837438 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.32886699507 107% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 55.0591133005 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.