Whether experimental learning can work well in formal education, agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of experimental learning can work well in formal education and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that formal education with experimental learning can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, well effects of experimental learning in formal education can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of formal education by experimental learning can work well far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues' potential implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 31.9359605911 72% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1128.0 1207.87684729 93% => OK
No of words: 197.0 242.827586207 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.72588832487 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.92707691288 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24718395908 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 139.433497537 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.634517766497 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 362.7 379.143842365 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 12.6551724138 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.8715594882 50.4703680194 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.0 104.977214359 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.625 20.9669160288 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.25397266985 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.12807881773 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299280831647 0.242375264174 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129602438894 0.0925447433944 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123866245169 0.071462118173 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210637132082 0.151781067708 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0413573168329 0.0609392437508 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 12.6369458128 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.25 11.5310837438 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.44 8.32886699507 125% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 55.0591133005 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 200 words wanted.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.